<- Back
Summary

Why were EUA prices so low until 2018?

Return to Blog
Sommaire
Book a call

Before 2018, European Union Allowances (EUA) prices remained low, rarely exceeding €20 and often staying in single digits territory. Initially, the way of issuing allowances, combined with the macroeconomic environment, led to an oversupplied European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) market.

The initial setting of the cap 

In the first phases of the EU ETS, the emissions cap was set based on individual estimates provided by each member state about their expected “carbon needs”. These estimates were summed to set the total cap for the EU. However, this method led to an over-allocation of allowances, meaning that installations were offered a higher EUA budget than they actually needed. As a result, the market was flooded with excess allowances from the very beginning.

Impact of the Financial Crisis

The 2008 Global Financial Crisis further exacerbated the oversupply problem. Economic activity slowed significantly, leading to reduced industrial production and, consequently, lower emissions. With emissions falling, the demand for EUAs plummeted. A carbon budget that was already higher than the demand levels faced an even greater decrease in demand for allowances. This drop drove the price of EUAs to levels around €5, where it stagnated for nearly a decade.

The regulatory - voluntary carbon markets mix 

Another factor of the initially low prices was allowing for international voluntary credits (such as Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs) issued by the UN) to be used for EU ETS compliance. These credits could be used in place of EUAs, in fact increasing the supply of compliance allowances further. CERs were often cheaper than EUAs, trading well below €5 and sometimes as low as €0.20. The availability of these inexpensive alternatives reduced the demand for EUAs, compounding the problem of oversupply and keeping prices low.

Structural oversupply and accumulation

The combination of those factors made the EU ETS experience a long period of structural oversupply, with a large number of EUAs building up in the market. Even during Phase II (2008-2012) and Phase III (2013-2020), when regulatory changes were made to better match the cap with actual emissions, the surplus continued. By the end of Phase II, there were about 2 billion unused EUAs. Despite efforts to reduce the cap and improve market operations, the large excess of allowances kept prices low.

The EU ETS is a pioneering mechanism, and the initial phases were a learning period for both regulators and installations - they were adapting to the new reality of carbon becoming the tradable commodity of tomorrow. The early years of the scheme were characterized by a structural oversupply, but this issue has since been addressed, leading to the increasingly tighter market we have today.

Do you like this article?

Share it with your network and introduce Homaio to those interested in impact investing!

The Homing Bird

A newsletter to help you understand the key challenges of climate finance.

Sign up to our newsletter

Utimate guide to carbon markets

Dive into the world of carbon markets, where economics, finance, and environmental science converge. Get your ultimate guide now.

Thank You !
Find our guide with the following link 👉
Download whitepaper
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
White Paper homaio

Do you like this article?

Share it with your network and introduce Homaio to those interested in impact investing!

Understanding in depth

Decrypting Trump’s impact on Climate - Part 1
April 1, 2025

Decrypting Trump’s impact on Climate - Part 1

In just a few short months, Donald Trump has laid waste not only to U.S. climate policy, but also to the political, legal, intellectual, and physical infrastructure that underpins it. In doing so, he has sent shockwaves through public and private markets, and upended the industrial and energy strategies of most—if not all—nations. More critically, he has steered our collective trajectory onto a faster, more dangerous collision course with a warming planet. This is a two-part series on the impact of Trump on climate. In this first part, we will cover: - How Trump has dismantled U.S. climate legislation - How this policy overhaul is being fleshed out across the administration - The very real implications for US companies and consumers.

The "Omnibus" Simplification of the CSRD and Taxonomy: A Setback for the Fight Against Climate Change?
April 1, 2025

The "Omnibus" Simplification of the CSRD and Taxonomy: A Setback for the Fight Against Climate Change?

The European Union's "omnibus" simplification of the CSRD and the EU taxonomy aims to streamline sustainability regulations. However, there are concerns that this simplification could hinder the fight against climate change, potentially leading to a rollback in environmental protection and a weakening of efforts to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. Advocates argue for strict and ambitious regulations to maintain Europe's leadership in sustainable development and curb greenwashing, emphasizing the importance of transparency and corporate accountability.

How can investing in European Union Allowances accelerate emissions reduction ? 
March 25, 2025

How can investing in European Union Allowances accelerate emissions reduction ? 

Over the past decade, EU emission allowances (EUAs) have grown by an average of 26.58% annually. However, assessing environmental impact is challenging. Private investors often wonder about their influence on the market. This edition of The Homing Bird analyses how the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) supports Europe's decarbonization goals and the role investors play in this process.

Understanding in depth

No items found.

You might also like

Decrypting Trump’s impact on Climate - Part 1
April 1, 2025

Decrypting Trump’s impact on Climate - Part 1

In just a few short months, Donald Trump has laid waste not only to U.S. climate policy, but also to the political, legal, intellectual, and physical infrastructure that underpins it. In doing so, he has sent shockwaves through public and private markets, and upended the industrial and energy strategies of most—if not all—nations. More critically, he has steered our collective trajectory onto a faster, more dangerous collision course with a warming planet. This is a two-part series on the impact of Trump on climate. In this first part, we will cover: - How Trump has dismantled U.S. climate legislation - How this policy overhaul is being fleshed out across the administration - The very real implications for US companies and consumers.

The "Omnibus" Simplification of the CSRD and Taxonomy: A Setback for the Fight Against Climate Change?
April 1, 2025

The "Omnibus" Simplification of the CSRD and Taxonomy: A Setback for the Fight Against Climate Change?

The European Union's "omnibus" simplification of the CSRD and the EU taxonomy aims to streamline sustainability regulations. However, there are concerns that this simplification could hinder the fight against climate change, potentially leading to a rollback in environmental protection and a weakening of efforts to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. Advocates argue for strict and ambitious regulations to maintain Europe's leadership in sustainable development and curb greenwashing, emphasizing the importance of transparency and corporate accountability.

How can investing in European Union Allowances accelerate emissions reduction ? 
March 25, 2025

How can investing in European Union Allowances accelerate emissions reduction ? 

Over the past decade, EU emission allowances (EUAs) have grown by an average of 26.58% annually. However, assessing environmental impact is challenging. Private investors often wonder about their influence on the market. This edition of The Homing Bird analyses how the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) supports Europe's decarbonization goals and the role investors play in this process.

You might also like

No items found.