<- Back
Summary

What is the social cost of carbon?

Summary

The social cost of carbon (SCC) estimates the monetary damages caused by CO2 emissions, influenced by human activity and political considerations. Diverse estimates exist, but current carbon prices may not reflect the high end of SCC estimates. Investing in sustainable development and responsible investing is therefore essential to mitigate environmental damage and promote ethical investments.

Return to Blog
Sommaire
Book a call

Releasing carbon into the atmosphere damages human health, societies, and the economy. The social cost of carbon (SCC) estimates the monetary value of the total damages caused by each tonne of CO2 released.

It all starts with human activity

Human activities demand energy, which is mostly obtained through the combustion of fossil fuels, releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. This accumulation of greenhouse gases leads to higher global temperatures. The resulting warming causes extreme weather, rising sea levels, and disruptions to ecosystems. In turn, these changes negatively impact human health by increasing respiratory and heat-related illnesses, as well as the spread of infectious diseases. Also, environmental shifts disrupt agriculture, damage infrastructure, displace communities... 

The complex task of computing the damages

First, finding the social cost of carbon requires identifying all the damages associated with the temperature rise caused by human activity.

Next, economic values are assigned to these damages, individually. Scientists assess the costs of repairs, healthcare, and any other mitigation measures. These values are then discounted to reflect the time value of money, as the concept of social cost of carbon is a continuous one, over long periods of time. Future costs and benefits are not valued equally to present ones.

The final step of the recipe is to divide this figure by the number of tons of carbon emitted (or projected) - the goal is to derive the cost per ton of CO2 released.

A climate policy tool Politically Charged Issue

Computing the social cost of carbon can be influenced by political considerations. The social cost of carbon is a crucial metric for evaluating the effectiveness of climate policies. It helps determine how much a government should invest today to prevent future expenses associated with the damage caused by a specific amount of CO2 emissions. In essence, it measures the current investment needed to avoid future costs equivalent to the damages caused by X tonnes of CO2.

A politically charged issue

In response to varying political ambitions, researchers may choose different assumptions in their computations to align with their government's climate policies. For example:

  • During the Obama administration, the SCC was set at $43 per ton.
  • The Trump administration, in its first days in office in 2017, reduced this figure to $3-5 by changing research assumptions.
  • On his first day in office, President Biden raised the SCC to $51.

Diverse Academic Estimates

Even among academics, there is significant disagreement on the SCC, depending on the different scientific approaches and assumptions. Some estimates include:

  • IPCC : $15 - $220 (2010 PPP level)
  • OECD: $147
  • World Bank: $160
  • Pindyck (Economists): $174
  • Rennert et al.: $185
  • EPA: $190
  • Moore and Diaz: $220
  • Alain Quinet, France Stratégie: $250
  • Pindyck (Climate Scientists): $316
  • Nordhaus: $325
  • Ricke et al.: $417
  • Wang et al.: $2,387
  • Kikstra et al.: $3,000

The current EUA price does not accurately reflect the high estimates of the social cost of carbon. As carbon prices rise, they will increasingly embody the principle that polluters should pay for the environmental damage they cause.

Do you like this article?

Share it with your network and introduce Homaio to those interested in impact investing!

The Homing Bird

A newsletter to help you understand the key challenges of climate finance.

Sign up to our newsletter

Utimate guide to carbon markets

Dive into the world of carbon markets, where economics, finance, and environmental science converge. Get your ultimate guide now.

Thank You !
Find our guide with the following link 👉
Download whitepaper
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
White Paper homaio

Do you like this article?

Share it with your network and introduce Homaio to those interested in impact investing!

Understanding in depth

How to Invest €100,000 in 2025: A Complete Guide to Optimizing Your Investments
July 3, 2025

How to Invest €100,000 in 2025: A Complete Guide to Optimizing Your Investments

How to optimize your €100,000 in 2025? This comprehensive guide helps you navigate investment options, from secure savings accounts to dynamic placements like carbon quotas. Learn how to assess your profile, understand 2025 market trends, and implement a diversified strategy, while avoiding common mistakes, to grow your capital.

Sustainable ETFs: How to Invest in Responsible Funds in 2025?
July 2, 2025

Sustainable ETFs: How to Invest in Responsible Funds in 2025?

This comprehensive guide explores sustainable ETFs, a growing investment trend for 2025. It defines what sustainable ETFs are, highlights key types like climate, renewable energy, and water funds, and provides criteria for choosing the best-performing options. The article also discusses the limitations of sustainable ETFs, such as greenwashing and passive influence, and presents alternative sustainable investment solutions like ISR funds, green bonds, and carbon allowances, emphasizing the importance of diversification for impactful investing

What's the Difference Between Stocks and Bonds?
June 24, 2025

What's the Difference Between Stocks and Bonds?

Stocks and bonds are the pillars of many investment portfolios, but they differ fundamentally. Stocks represent a share of ownership in a company, offering high but uncertain return potential through dividends or capital gains. Bonds are debt instruments where the investor lends money in exchange for regular interest and capital repayment, offering more stability but lower returns. The choice between the two depends on your risk profile, investment horizon, and financial goals, with diversification often combining these two assets as the most recommended strategy.

Understanding in depth

No items found.

You might also like

How to Invest €100,000 in 2025: A Complete Guide to Optimizing Your Investments
July 3, 2025

How to Invest €100,000 in 2025: A Complete Guide to Optimizing Your Investments

How to optimize your €100,000 in 2025? This comprehensive guide helps you navigate investment options, from secure savings accounts to dynamic placements like carbon quotas. Learn how to assess your profile, understand 2025 market trends, and implement a diversified strategy, while avoiding common mistakes, to grow your capital.

Sustainable ETFs: How to Invest in Responsible Funds in 2025?
July 2, 2025

Sustainable ETFs: How to Invest in Responsible Funds in 2025?

This comprehensive guide explores sustainable ETFs, a growing investment trend for 2025. It defines what sustainable ETFs are, highlights key types like climate, renewable energy, and water funds, and provides criteria for choosing the best-performing options. The article also discusses the limitations of sustainable ETFs, such as greenwashing and passive influence, and presents alternative sustainable investment solutions like ISR funds, green bonds, and carbon allowances, emphasizing the importance of diversification for impactful investing

What's the Difference Between Stocks and Bonds?
June 24, 2025

What's the Difference Between Stocks and Bonds?

Stocks and bonds are the pillars of many investment portfolios, but they differ fundamentally. Stocks represent a share of ownership in a company, offering high but uncertain return potential through dividends or capital gains. Bonds are debt instruments where the investor lends money in exchange for regular interest and capital repayment, offering more stability but lower returns. The choice between the two depends on your risk profile, investment horizon, and financial goals, with diversification often combining these two assets as the most recommended strategy.

You might also like

No items found.